top of page
WhiteEYSY Logo 2025.png

Marketing Maturity Is a Reflection of How You Lead

Oct 16
6 min read
Business team meeting in a glass office; presenter smiles beside a whiteboard labeled Marketing Plan while coworkers listen.

Picture a founder in Jakarta who buys a new attribution platform to settle an argument the team keeps having. Campaigns are running across four markets, the numbers look busy, and nobody can say with confidence which activity is earning its place. Six weeks later the dashboards are live and neatly colour-coded, and the same question sits on the table untouched. Which of these do we back harder, and who gets to decide?


The software did what it promised. The problem it was bought to fix lived somewhere else, in how choices got made and who was trusted to make them. Maturity is the word for closing that gap, and it has almost nothing to do with the stack. A marketing organisation matures when it gets steadily better at turning intent into results that improve on purpose, and that capacity grows or stalls with how the business is led.


Why the new platform never moved the needle


Two coworkers smile and point at a laptop in a bright office with plants, coffee cups, and notebooks.

Buying software feels like momentum. It is visible, it is decisive, and it gives everyone a thing to point at in the next meeting. The catch is that a tool only encodes a decision the team already knows how to make. Point it at a question the team has never answered on its own, and it hands back a tidier version of the same confusion. In the Spring 2024 CMO Survey, marketing leaders reported using only 56.4 per cent of the martech tools they had already bought, and rated the payoff from that technology 34 per cent below what they had hoped for. Half the value is purchased and then left in the box.


The reflex is to blame the budget, and the budget will not carry the blame. Gartner's 2025 survey put marketing spend flat at 7.7 per cent of company revenue, with 59 per cent of CMOs saying they lacked the money to deliver their own strategy. When tools sit idle and budgets feel tight in the same breath, the binding constraint is the discipline around the spending, and rarely its size. That is worth saying carefully, because there are real cases where a team is starved of a basic capability and a purchase is the honest fix. The Jakarta founder was not in one of them. This founder had the data long before they bought a prettier way to look at it. What they lacked was an agreement about who got to act on it.


A ladder you can stand on


Maturity is easier to act on when you can see the rungs. The ladder below describes how decisions get made at each level and what an ordinary week feels like from the inside. Read it as a mirror you hold up to your own team, then find the rung that sounds most like last month.

Stage

How decisions get made

What it feels like day to day

Founder led

The business is early and the story still lives in your head.

Your time and steady attention every single week.

In-house hire

Marketing is steady enough to fill a role and you want it close.

Salary, tools, and the leadership to keep that person growing.

Agency or specialist partner

You need range across many crafts, and you need it soon.

A clear brief and an open line of communication.

Hybrid, a small core with outside help

Some parts are steady and other parts move quickly.

One clear owner inside to hold the whole thread together.

No ladder maps a real business cleanly. Most teams straddle two rungs at once, steady on one channel and reactive on another, so where you sit is a judgement only you and the people doing the work can make honestly.


Reading your own rung without flinching


Team meeting in a bright glass-walled office, woman in hijab leading discussion while coworkers take notes around a table.

The fastest way to locate your rung is to remember the last campaign that underperformed and watch what the room did. In a reactive team the conversation drifts toward blame, or more often toward nobody in particular, and the plan for next time is mostly hope. In an accountable team one named person expected that result, is not surprised by it, and already has a view on what to change. The difference is ownership, and it is the quiet line the ladder is really measuring.


Ownership reads like an org-chart detail and behaves like a leadership habit. It works because a single person who owns a number has a reason to forecast it, to watch it as it moves, and to adjust before the quarter closes. Spread that same number across four people and it belongs to none of them, so no one carries it in their head between meetings. The part founders most often keep back is the authority, handing over the target while holding on to the decisions that move it. A person accountable for a result they cannot influence learns to manage the founder's mood instead of the outcome, and the team's maturity quietly caps at that point. The reasonable objection is that some calls really do need the founder. Fair, and the test is whether that list is short and stable, or whether it keeps expanding to cover anything that matters.


The rung where most teams stall


Woman smiling at a desk reviews a bar chart beside a laptop in a bright office with city skyscrapers outside.

Climbing from organising to accountable, and then on to compounding, tends to stall in the same place. Plenty of teams own a dashboard. Far fewer hold the habit of letting a number change a plan they were fond of. The pressure to close that gap is rising. In the 2025 CMO Survey, 64 per cent of marketing leaders named demonstrating the impact of marketing on financial outcomes as their single biggest challenge, with reported pressure from CFOs climbing to 63 per cent.


The habit that answers that pressure is cheaper and harder to buy than any platform. It looks like a standing thirty-minute review where the team writes down, before the campaign runs, what a good result would be, then meets the real number with curiosity and a decision. The mechanism sits in the sequencing. Agree on success beforehand and the review has a fixed line to measure against, so a mediocre result cannot be quietly reclassified as fine after the fact. Skip that step and every outcome becomes a story, and the team learns nothing it did not already believe. A fair worry is that rigid targets punish honest experiments. The fix is in how you set the line, naming what you expect to learn alongside what you expect to earn, so a campaign that loses money but kills a bad assumption still counts as a win.


This compounds fastest where the market moves. Across Southeast Asia the digital economy is on track to pass US$300 billion in gross merchandise value in 2025 and is still growing around 15 per cent year on year. Eleven markets, many languages, and buyer behaviour that shifts by the quarter reward the teams that learn on a schedule and punish the ones still running on assumptions from two years ago.


The founder sets how high the ladder goes


Smiling coworkers chat around a conference table with laptops and notebooks in a bright modern office.

A marketing team rarely climbs higher than the way its founder makes decisions, and the reason is unglamorous. Teams optimise for whatever gets rewarded. Change direction most weeks and the team gets very good at reading your mood and very cautious about committing to anything you might reverse. Ask for evidence and honour it even when it argues against an idea you liked, and the team learns that bringing you an inconvenient number is safe, then starts bringing you more of them. The ceiling has little to do with the talent below you. It is set by the height of the example above them.


That makes growing maturity a leadership project before it is a marketing one. In practice it looks like protecting a plan long enough to read the result, backing an owner out loud in front of the team, and treating a missed target as information the business already paid for. None of it needs new software. All of it asks a founder to hold a steadier hand than the market rewards in any single week, which is the hard part, because the market is loud and a plan takes a quarter to answer. The honest limit is that this cannot be delegated or faked. A team can feel the difference between a founder who wants evidence and one who wants agreement.


One honest move for this week


Pick the single most important marketing objective for this quarter. Write one name beside it, the person accountable for the outcome, and confirm out loud that they can change the plan without asking your permission first. If you cannot land on a name, or if the honest answer is that the name defaults to yours, you have found the exact rung your team is stuck on this week, and the exact thing to hand over. That one line moves maturity further than most software renewals, and it costs nothing but the discipline to hold to it once the week gets loud.


Climbing these rungs is patient work, and it goes easier with someone who has watched teams do it across the region's eleven markets. If you are weighing where your team sits and what the next honest step looks like, come and talk it through with us at Eysy.


Sources

 
 
 

Comments

bottom of page